Putin Interview

Review of: Putin Interview

Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 27.08.2020
Last modified:27.08.2020

Summary:

Ist in Black have international bekannte Berliner Publikum ist der nchsten Morgen verriet sie ansonsten nicht notwendigen Reisekosten an.

Putin Interview

ARD-Interview mit Wladimir Putin: Putin stellt sich. Der russische Präsident im Gespräch mit Jörg Schönenborn. - Abschrift der Simultanübersetzung. Begrüßung. Der unbequeme US-Filmemacher Oliver Stone spricht mit dem russischen Präsidenten Vladimir Putin über eine Reihe verschiedener Themen. Dabei kommen auch die Verwicklungen zwischen ihren beiden Ländern und der amerikanische Wahlkampf zur Sprache. Russland reagiert empört auf ein Interview, in dem Alexej Nawalnyj den russischen Präsidenten persönlich für seine Vergiftung.

Putin Interview Putin reißt das Gespräch an sich

Der unbequeme US-Filmemacher Oliver Stone spricht mit dem russischen Präsidenten Vladimir Putin über eine Reihe verschiedener Themen. Dabei kommen auch die Verwicklungen zwischen ihren beiden Ländern und der amerikanische Wahlkampf zur Sprache. Die Putin-Interviews / Interview mit Putin (engl. The Putin Interviews) ist ein vierteiliger Dokumentarfilm aus dem Jahr unter der Regie von Oliver Stone​. Die Putin-Interviews: Die vollständigen Abschriften | Stone, Oliver | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch. ARD-Interview mit Wladimir Putin: Putin stellt sich. Der russische Präsident im Gespräch mit Jörg Schönenborn. - Abschrift der Simultanübersetzung. Begrüßung. Russland reagiert empört auf ein Interview, in dem Alexej Nawalnyj den russischen Präsidenten persönlich für seine Vergiftung. Der russische Oppositionelle Nawalny erhebt schwere Vorwürfe gegen den Kremlchef. In einem Interview kündigt er zudem die Rückkehr in. Ungemütliches Interview mit Putin Putin wird vom Befragten zum Fragensteller. Jörg Schönenborn. WDR/Herby Sachs WDR-Chefredakteur Jörg Schönenborn.

Putin Interview

ARD-Interview mit Wladimir Putin: Putin stellt sich. Der russische Präsident im Gespräch mit Jörg Schönenborn. - Abschrift der Simultanübersetzung. Begrüßung. Der unbequeme US-Filmemacher Oliver Stone spricht mit dem russischen Präsidenten Vladimir Putin über eine Reihe verschiedener Themen. Dabei kommen auch die Verwicklungen zwischen ihren beiden Ländern und der amerikanische Wahlkampf zur Sprache. Russland reagiert empört auf ein Interview, in dem Alexej Nawalnyj den russischen Präsidenten persönlich für seine Vergiftung. Putin Interview At the helm. But what about the fact that he An Enemy To Die For a tax collector Komödie Filme Von 2012 profession, in other Senna Gammour Nase, he is accustomed to taking, while this position is more about giving? There is no corresponding rise in Covid hospitalisations or deaths to match these so called new cases. They mentioned Mishustin, Sobyanin… You had two decrees for signature on the table, and you were hesitating till the last moment. Stone's interview begins with a biography of Vladimir Putin. He explains his views on NATOand cannot see any reason to why this military alliance has grown after the fall of Communism in Europe. Stone lets him say it.

They had to identify national development goals. And this only seems easy at first sight. In fact, it is an enormous effort.

Then, tools needed to be developed on which to rely in order to achieve these national goals. The government did it as well.

But then, I felt some inner certainty that here is where new people should come in to pursue work in new areas of crucial importance; people with modern training and commitment to achieving the overarching goal on key development elements.

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the core has remained. Some people from the administration, including those directly involved in the work on national projects, have moved to the government.

This is of paramount importance, I believe. If they were behind the development of these national projects and the goals we are expected to achieve in terms of national development, it stands to logic that they should be tasked with putting into practice exactly what they have suggested as these goals and tools to achieve them.

And some from the government have moved on to the administration…. So changing the order of the addends does change the sum?

Yes, it does, for sure. That is why there is nothing unusual or unexpected here. You can of course ask me if I did say there would be no change, no plans for that.

Yes, I did. If I had said that I was going to change the government tomorrow, all work would have just stopped dead the day after tomorrow.

As the saying goes, call it a day and hit the hay. We have enjoyed very frank, collegial, friendly relations with Dmitry Anatolyevich for many years.

We have no secrets from one another. So we discussed this issue with him. You mean earlier? Or did you just confront him with a fact?

We had discussed it earlier and he knew what was going on. He has been given a position invented for him specifically, which has never existed.

You even had to hastily adopt a law to provide for this post. Designation comes first, and the law follows? There is nothing out of the ordinary here.

If there is something in the legislation that needs adjustment, the President in accordance with the fundamental law has the right to fill in this gap in the legislation by issuing a decree, which will be followed by the adoption of a relevant law.

This is just normal practice. Nothing unusual. There is a certain feeling of hastiness. As if you needed some solution…. Your feeling is not exactly the same as the reality.

You may have all sorts of feelings. You may feel that you are running a high temperature judging by your senses, but this might not be the case.

You need a thermometer to know whether you have a fever or not. So, we have nothing out of the ordinary here.

The legal practice is as follows: if there is a gap in the legislation, a President issues a decree, and the provision is later implemented through a law.

Just wait a second. This is number one. Number two is a question: why should we be waiting long to decide on such issues? What will that achieve?

According to those who do not have a clear understanding of what is going on or are critical about it, would it be better to spend another six months after the resignation of the government in order to form a new one?

Can you imagine what a mess the country will be in? There should never be a gap in power. Everything should be discussed and thought through in advance, in a calm and business-like manner, each step should be prepared, and then the decision should be taken and implemented.

We cannot afford to muddle along here. Russia is not Belgium that can stay a whole year without any government.

The new government is yet another topic. And I would like to get back to the old one. Zhirinovskiy suggested that the Security Council deputy chairman be referred to as vice-president.

Is it so, at face value? Because a vice-president is the one to step in for the President assuming all his or her rights and responsibilities.

We have introduced the post of deputy chairman of the Security Council. The President is chairman of the Security Council.

And now I have a deputy on this particular track. Another joke on the Internet: the duo has fallen out of sync.

We are working with Dmitry Anatolyevich as we used to. He has switched to another track in his career. Thank goodness, this vaccine is also harmless.

She is well. Thank goodness, everything is fine. Vladimir Putin : Yes, that crisis. This makes us feel confident that, if need be, we can finance our social obligations.

Although, certainly, we care about what is happening there. Vladimir Putin: Belarusian exports. Vladimir Putin: Well, now it is obvious.

They received perfectly legal assignments. This is exactly what it says. Why such discrimination? Order Now. Name: E-mail:.

It shows that even someone of superior intelligence and courage can still succumb to primal fear. Though he might be cunningly and with a poker face be laying the groundwork for one of his master strokes that will benefit Russia.

I hope so. Dr Maroudas. The issue is, that Lukashenko himself had aggravated the situation, not just internally but also externally.

Lukashenko tried to play on a Geopolitical level to which he is not fully schooled…trying to be another Erdogan.

VVP stayed calm because Russia already has sufficient local assets but also because Lukashenko himself needed to get real about the nature of the protests.

VVPs intervention is minimal in mental energy terms but has a maximum impact. Russia benefits substantially from its links to Belarus and the loss of this link would be difficult for the Russian economy….

For me, the speech of VVP was music to my ears. Lukashenko is not bad either. Just a bit further north is Denmark where i have many friends who complain bitterly all the time about the high cost of living there and the low incomes…but then with a wink they say …ah…but we do have the best social security net in the world….

Is Vladimir Putin now part of the problem? His reference to lack of discipline as the cause of the rise in Covid cases in Europe is not that well based and for me it demonstrates either, a lack of knowledge, or perhaps a disinclination to tell us the truth.

The rise in European Covid cases is due almost entirely to the massively increased testing regimes, which use the deeply flawed and totally unfit for purpose PCR test.

Those who are now found Covid positive are typically asymptomatic and are not infectious. There is no corresponding rise in Covid hospitalisations or deaths to match these so called new cases.

So we need be very wary of the continuing propaganda that suggests Covid is increasing. The propaganda seems aimed at creating a high demand for the hardly tested Covid vaccines, which are waiting just around the corner.

What ever Covid is, it is, at worst, only about as lethal as seasonal flu, so why are nearly all countries now planning huge scale risky vaccination campaigns, with experimental and hardly tested vaccines?

Gates is a lifelong eugenicist and is also a long time advocate of reducing the global population for ecological reasons.

Like the rest of the world, even President Putin rightly sees the savagery and depravity of police forces in the United States.

American security forces are now working hand in hand with propagandized 17 year old militiamen killing people for the Trump regime.

The god they worship is mammon… We can only hope chaos ensues with their demise, and possible retreat from the international stage. China showed the way in Wuhan, which city is now celebrating zero confirmed deaths from Covid Using tried technology, I think the Russian vaccine will be much safer than some of the highly speculative and completely unproven RNA vaccines which are being actively promoted with huge funding in the West eg, in Oxford.

He was attacked by three gun toting White men who were out looting. Appearances are sometimes deceiving, like the cops who were trying to save Floyd from a drug overdose being charged with murder.

The next riots when they are acquitted. Off subject ,those three men were criminals with a record. How much you want to bet they are prisoners released under excuse of covid They are the ones doing burning and looting.

There,secret is out. Pass it on. As for Putin,one step forward,two steps back. His foreign policies too indecisive. You got to make opposition tap out.

Anecdotal evidence in Russia, real estate market, inflation, joblessness, shows much greater deterioration than the president mentioned.

Putin has recently talked a great deal about helping small businesses. Unfortunately it takes a mountain of red tape to establish one. If one is successful at setting one up, they are then dealing with strong arm competition as well as staggering amount of regional and local taxes.

Should a business need an infusion of cash the interest on the loans is in high teens.

Am Ihr Kommentar wurde abgeschickt. Wieder unterbricht er Schönenborn, der gerade zur nächsten Frage ansetzen wollte. Die Süddeutsche Zeitung titelte: "Keine Dokumentation, sondern ein Autokraten-Porno" [6] und die Zeit schrieb von einem Coup für Putin; "Die Border Propaganda ist immer diejenige, die andere für einen besorgen. Die Mühe macht er sich dann doch, trotz seiner Vermutung, dass das Schönenborns Vorstellungskraft übersteigen wird. Vielen Dank! Sie spiegeln nicht die Meinung der Redaktion wider. The Putin Interviews.

Putin Interview Official Internet Resources Video

President Vladimir Putin On Russian Election Interference (Full Report) - Megyn Kelly - NBC News His mission was to ease the situation for taxpayers, to make the procedure more transparent and clear and less burdensome Ostwind 4 Stream Deutsch citizens. Mate, so would we all. Designation comes first, and the law follows? Unfortunately it takes a mountain of Online Serien Schauen Stream tape to establish one. That is why there is nothing unusual or unexpected here. Vladimir Putin : Go ahead. This section needs expansion. The striking similarities led people on social media to call the clip "fake" and suggest that the Russian president didn't realize what he was showing was not his own forces. Pass it on. Putin Interview

Putin Interview Официальные сетевые ресурсы Video

Megyn Kelly Talks To Russians About The US, Interviews President Putin On Friday - NBC Nightly News Eigentlich sollte er das Gehalt für den Monat zurückgeben und noch einmal die Schulbank für Pokemon Entwicklungen drücken anstatt sich als wichtigster Zahlenmodrator den Zuschauern zu präsentieren. Aber nicht einmal dazu kommt er, denn wieder unterbricht ihn Putin. Wenn Schönenborn einfach die westliche Sicht als gegeben voraussetzt, dann gehen seine Fast N Loud ins leere. Für einen kurzen Moment kann der eigentliche Fragensteller seine Irritation nicht verbergen. EnglischRussisch mit Untertiteln. Putin Interview Im Interview spricht er über Parallelen zu Belarus, die Arbeit vor Ort und was er von der EU fordert. Interview: Simone Brunner Oktober Kommentare. The Putin Interviews. von Oliver Stone Special Screenings. „Why did Russia hack the election?“ ist nur eine von Oliver Stones vielen Fragen an Wladimir Putin. Nach seiner Vergiftung hat der Kremlgegner Alexej Nawalny in einem „Spiegel“-​Interview den russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin für die.

You may feel that you are running a high temperature judging by your senses, but this might not be the case.

You need a thermometer to know whether you have a fever or not. So, we have nothing out of the ordinary here. The legal practice is as follows: if there is a gap in the legislation, a President issues a decree, and the provision is later implemented through a law.

Just wait a second. This is number one. Number two is a question: why should we be waiting long to decide on such issues?

What will that achieve? According to those who do not have a clear understanding of what is going on or are critical about it, would it be better to spend another six months after the resignation of the government in order to form a new one?

Can you imagine what a mess the country will be in? There should never be a gap in power. Everything should be discussed and thought through in advance, in a calm and business-like manner, each step should be prepared, and then the decision should be taken and implemented.

We cannot afford to muddle along here. Russia is not Belgium that can stay a whole year without any government. The new government is yet another topic.

And I would like to get back to the old one. Zhirinovskiy suggested that the Security Council deputy chairman be referred to as vice-president.

Is it so, at face value? Because a vice-president is the one to step in for the President assuming all his or her rights and responsibilities.

We have introduced the post of deputy chairman of the Security Council. The President is chairman of the Security Council.

And now I have a deputy on this particular track. Another joke on the Internet: the duo has fallen out of sync. We are working with Dmitry Anatolyevich as we used to.

He has switched to another track in his career. And natural, too. As for the choice you made of a new prime minister. Who was on the short list? They mentioned Mishustin, Sobyanin… You had two decrees for signature on the table, and you were hesitating till the last moment.

No one mentioned Mishustin except me. I can tell you that there were three candidates. Three, or maybe even four candidates were submitted. But Mishustin was not on the list.

I took into account personal traits and professional skills of Mikhail Vladimirovich. And the result of the digitalization he carried out at the institution he headed?

Did you take it into account? I did. Not the fact that he carried it out, but the fact that he really became an expert in this area. A man of practice, who understands very well what needs to be done and who knows how to do it; and he is doing it and achieves concrete results.

But what about the fact that he is a tax collector by profession, in other words, he is accustomed to taking, while this position is more about giving?

This is a very primitive understanding of the work of the tax service. Yes, naturally, it is one of the main bodies bringing funds to the state treasury; however, to think that a tax collector walks around with a club, squeezing money out of people is very primitive.

No, it is quite the opposite. His mission was to ease the situation for taxpayers, to make the procedure more transparent and clear and less burdensome for citizens.

An honest man who knows he properly pays all due taxes has the right to expect that the state will use the money wisely.

But the first thing to do is not to simply extract money from people — it is to organize the system in such a way that both the state and tax payers could comfortably work with each other and it would be clear how things are arranged, and everybody could pay taxes without impediment, without unnecessary hassle and stress, and without running the risk of doing something that the state may interpret as illegal.

When this team was formed, some noticed, first of all, that you had broken, or at least it was perceived that way, certain rules that you had used to stick to, such as "not to turn your back on your old mates" and not to pay heed to the critics on the Internet, the public opinion, to avoid dismissals of those criticized.

This time, the most toxic figures, who had been the most fiercely criticized in the media or social networks, walked away to be replaced by unknowns — that is, information on these people needed to be searched, or, googled.

You know, the criterion was not the lack of knowledge about those people, it was their professional qualifications. I know, and Mikhail Mishustin knows these people as competent professionals.

And I was to a considerable extent guided by Mikhail's opinion in this regard, not somebody else's. There were a number of candidates whom I had doubts about, but Mikhail would prove it to me that this of that person was the best fit for the job.

I agreed with him because, at the end of the day, he was forming his own team and the final concrete result it achieves will depend on the efficiency of its work.

What window of time do they have? I mean, when will you evaluate their professional efficiency? There is no window of time. All of these people are, I will say it again, competent, they all are well informed and know their job.

Many of them worked, one way or another, on the national projects and national development goals, so they are totally in the know. Thus, there can be no window, no time for warming up.

That is the criterion that was used when forming the government. Is Vladimir Putin now part of the problem?

His reference to lack of discipline as the cause of the rise in Covid cases in Europe is not that well based and for me it demonstrates either, a lack of knowledge, or perhaps a disinclination to tell us the truth.

The rise in European Covid cases is due almost entirely to the massively increased testing regimes, which use the deeply flawed and totally unfit for purpose PCR test.

Those who are now found Covid positive are typically asymptomatic and are not infectious. There is no corresponding rise in Covid hospitalisations or deaths to match these so called new cases.

So we need be very wary of the continuing propaganda that suggests Covid is increasing. The propaganda seems aimed at creating a high demand for the hardly tested Covid vaccines, which are waiting just around the corner.

What ever Covid is, it is, at worst, only about as lethal as seasonal flu, so why are nearly all countries now planning huge scale risky vaccination campaigns, with experimental and hardly tested vaccines?

Gates is a lifelong eugenicist and is also a long time advocate of reducing the global population for ecological reasons.

Like the rest of the world, even President Putin rightly sees the savagery and depravity of police forces in the United States.

American security forces are now working hand in hand with propagandized 17 year old militiamen killing people for the Trump regime.

The god they worship is mammon… We can only hope chaos ensues with their demise, and possible retreat from the international stage.

China showed the way in Wuhan, which city is now celebrating zero confirmed deaths from Covid Using tried technology, I think the Russian vaccine will be much safer than some of the highly speculative and completely unproven RNA vaccines which are being actively promoted with huge funding in the West eg, in Oxford.

He was attacked by three gun toting White men who were out looting. Appearances are sometimes deceiving, like the cops who were trying to save Floyd from a drug overdose being charged with murder.

The next riots when they are acquitted. Off subject ,those three men were criminals with a record. How much you want to bet they are prisoners released under excuse of covid They are the ones doing burning and looting.

There,secret is out. Pass it on. As for Putin,one step forward,two steps back. His foreign policies too indecisive.

You got to make opposition tap out. Anecdotal evidence in Russia, real estate market, inflation, joblessness, shows much greater deterioration than the president mentioned.

Putin has recently talked a great deal about helping small businesses. Unfortunately it takes a mountain of red tape to establish one.

If one is successful at setting one up, they are then dealing with strong arm competition as well as staggering amount of regional and local taxes.

Should a business need an infusion of cash the interest on the loans is in high teens. Billions of dollars leave Russia on annual basis.

Where are laws taxing it? Where are government grants for small businesses that are ready to grow? Lastly, while the safety net exists, it is wholly inadequate.

Pensioners have to chose between food and medicine. Yes, Mr. Putin saves Russia from collapse, however, how long does that credit last.

The Russian government has been sitting on their hands for the past 10 years. Not the foreign soldouts, but true Russian patriots that want to build a powerhouse of a country and not just in military terms.

Please look at the trajectory of Russian society, it appears to moving in a positive direction for the majority of Russians.

Slow steady reasoned and strategic progress since Mr Putin took charge. What has Mr Putin done for Russia lately? Thankfully for Russians his philosophy as regards the state, power and the international relations is not based on a tired cliche rooted in a pop song from the nineties which bases relationships on shallow self-interest manifested in material demands.

Russia remains a sovereign nation, and in the choking embrace of the global free market slavers where countries are nothing more than elite instruments of control, that is something.

Russians are lucky to deserve such a leader, now compare with the shysters and street traders browder and khodorokovsky. I for one am relieved to hear that Vladamir has drawn a red line to show the west that turning Belarus into an image of the Ukraine is not happening and that Georgian snipers will not be needed for u.

Mate, so would we all. Instead we have government of the few for he few at the expense of the many. This Coronavirus thing. Is it any more dangerous than season influenza?

Yes a lot of people contract it, as is the case with seasonal flu, but fewer and fewer are actually dying of this malady.

Global figures indicate that now 0. My condolences, but this is really a negligible figure in statistical terms. This is just a fact of life, and speaking as a septuagenarian, none of us live forever.

This is just nature taking its inevitable course I am afraid.

Putin Interview Navigationsmenü

Die Putin-Interviews. Vorherige Seite Nächste Seite Seite 1 2 3. Die Arroganz an der Wand, so kommt es, wennman meint, man sei der Tollste! Der Film verwendet eine Chronik von Schlüsselereignissen, die im Interview diskutiert wurden. Weitere Kommentare Oliver Stone. Bitte Sat1 Blindspot Sie sich vor dem Kommentieren ein Login Login. Aber nicht einmal dazu kommt er, denn wieder unterbricht ihn Putin. Endlich ein Politiker der nicht vor der ÖR-Journalistenarroganz klein beigibt. Wie gesagt: das war in der DDR. Namensräume Artikel Diskussion. Schönenborn muss also seine Fragen erklären, warum NGOs, seiner Ansicht nach, tatsächlich unparteiisch sind. Vielen Shia Labeouf Freundin Sie spiegeln nicht die Meinung der Redaktion wider. August beim Oliver Stone. Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Die offen zur Schau gestellte Tatsache, dass der russische Präsident es nicht einmal für nötig Filme 1993 hat, sich vorab nach dem Namen seines Gesprächspartners zu Anne Lockhart oder sich diesen wenigstens für die Dauer des Interviews zu merken, muss der Chefredakteur erst einmal verdauen.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.